in

How To Fix Traffic Congestion🚦| Utopia #shorts

SUBSCRIBE:
Following a trip to Canberra Tony finds himself at loggerheads with Rhonda and Jim after he refuses to back a major new government initiative. Nat and Ash are forced to break some bad news to the Minister.

Season 4 Episode 8: The Ghost Of Christmas Future

Watch full episodes of Utopia on
ABC iview:
Stan:
Netflix:

Buy Seasons 1-4 of Utopia
JB Hi-Fi:
iTunes:
Google Play:

Follow Working Dog on Social
Facebook:
Instagram:
Twitter:

Working Dog Website:

Set inside the offices of the “Nation Building Authority”, a federal government organisation responsible for overseeing major infrastructure projects, Utopia explores that moment when bureaucracy and grand dreams collide.

Starring Rob Sitch, Celia Pacquola, Dave Lawson, Kitty Flanagan, Anthony 'Lehmo' Lehmann.

#Utopia #WorkingDogProductions

What do you think?

Written by daily reporters

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

GIPHY App Key not set. Please check settings

99 Comments

    • The paradox applies to public mass transit as well, the better you make it the more it’s used. The paradox is redundant because of course if you make a form of travel easier more people will use it, that’s not a bad thing.

    • ​@@saltyballsthe3rd Exactly this paradox only proves that you always need to improve your infrastructure.

      Besides we need to start 3D infrastructure. For once Musk was onto something but it still needs more planning. I saw a couple months back a bunch of architects and urban planners talking about sky bridges. Sky bridges are the opposite of Musks tunnels.

      In the end both hint at arcologies.

  1. This reminds me of how every time a shopping centre’s insides are improved and a bit more car park is added, there ends up being less parking than before because everybody from near and far flocks to it.

    • @@NigelTolley ideal would be to get rid of shopping centre with massive parking and have shops and grocers etc in the cities at walkable or bikable distances from people living there right?

    • Traffic rises until travel times are the same for car, bicycle, train, etc. As long as car is faster than train, people will add more cars to the road. To get car travel faster, increase train speed and frequency (and capacity) until people start switching to train

    • Actually, the solution is road privatisation and tolls (and transit privatisation in general). I don’t mean government-controlled “privatisation” where the government sells a protected monopoly to the highest bidder, but actually getting rid of the governments control over the sector altogether.

    • ​@@BrotherCreamyThere still has to be some central payment system to avoid toll booths on every piece of road and traffic congestion because of that. Which would result in monopoly again. And probably there would be a big company that would buy everything out resulting in monopoly again.

      Real estate is privately owned, but that does not make it affordable for general people. I’m afraid the same thing would happen to the roads. That is if I understand your idea correctly

  2. its actually the Downs-Thomson Paradox , the Jevons Paradox is similar but an exact one relating to road use is the Downs-Thomson paradox. I actually learnt about these cause i watched this short lol educational jokes are the best

    • For anyone wondering what it all actually means, it is this; You upgrade a road to add a lane, at first the people that currently use it see a decline in travel time since there is an extra lane.

      Over time GPS, word of mouth and things like the news spread the word that this new road decreases travel time, no one cares to bother to know why, or how much less travel time.

      Like in the video it could be just 2 minutes either way, but everyone just goes on about how it is faster, so now everyone watching Twitter and the news and using a GPS will end up flocking to this road.

      Now that everyone is on said road the extra lane does nothing, it’s not enough for the extra people and it gets worse.

      It happened with the Monash Freeway here in Melbourne, they added a lane, it got worse, they added ANOTHER lane, it got a little better.

      And when they were doing their first upgrades, at times I was finding it faster to travel off the freeway, that was until this effect took place again, and more people started going alternate routes.

      It still happens in my area, during peak I will go the back streets or get stuck in a 200 metre line of single lane traffic all trying to turn right with people cutting through a roundabout from a left turn only lane and almost causing an accident every time and going the backstreets if vastly quicker.

      The idea is to upgrade and plan for 500 years into the future and that’s not exaggerating, upgrading to make the road better for the current users just makes it faster for other people to join in until it is not.

      They need to plan to upgrade the freeway AND all the surrounding infrastructure in a 50km radius. Removing roundabouts, adding extra lanes all around the area, give people alternate choices that are also now faster.

      A freeway upgrade needs to have the entire localised area upgraded to match to allow traffic into and out of the freeway to move.

      It’s like adding an extra lane for an entire freeway, but bottle necking people into one lane at the end with a roundabout that goes into single lane streets, where is everyone going to go?

    • ​@@akaraven66 most of the increased flow is coming from other routes though, so its hardly of no overall benefit. While there will be some net increase from the new capacity, it would be relatively small, and natural growth would be dominant over time.
      So if you completely overkill the infrastructure to begin with, to absorb all rhe capacity it could possibly take plus many years more, you will overcome the effect

    • They are still talking about removing cars from Melbourne City, just taxis, Uber, buses and the likes. Get people to use transport so the traffic flow into and out of the city is better for public transport.

      This way they can add more bus routes, more trams, whatever other options, allow people maybe to bike more and get foot traffic flowing better.

      Because driving in the city can sometimes be a nightmare and certainly slower than just walking and catching a train.

      When I used to drive to the city I would park in the residential area down near the beach and bike up next to the tram line past the casino into the city, I saved so much time just not dealing with being in the CBD and finding parking, I would come off the Westgate and never have to deal with bumper to bumper traffic, it was great.

    • @@pradhyudh Not if you make it illegal and threaten to take away their license and vehicle away.

      Money fine always hits the most just the poor folks while giving the rich the way to break the law. Which is why you need to make it extra punishing.

      Make an area where cars are not allowed, only pedestrians, bikes and mass transit – everyone caught with a car in it the first time gets their license taken away and forced to re-do the exam. Second time, both the license and the car get taken. Third time, off to prison with you.

      I mean, if you want the law to be respected by all classes, that’s how you structure the punishment.

    • But thats true it will fix traffic. The problem is one road goes on one hwy. Thats not how you fix it. You make more hwys. Not more bandaids. This example would show that instead of one hwy causing an hour of waiting in traffic, we would effectively still decrease the eait time by 15 minutes. So yes the evidence shows we just need more hwys. Not more tiny roads.

    • @@juaecheverria0so you’re in favour of doing what government did in the 60s but at a larger scale?

      demolishing entire cities and communities and hundreds of thousands of homes just so you don’t have to use a train?

    • ​@@juaecheverria0 But more highways means more demand for travel. LA thought the same thing with more highways. Now they’ve got a dozen highways thru the metro area and it’s still as congested as ever. Yes, more people will get accessible travel. But congestion will NOT improve.

  3. I n d u c e d D e m a n d. First time I’ve seen this portrayed on film did a decent job. I was worried they weren’t gonna go and show it until he started showing the modeling as the years progressed. Great job

    • All of the US ignores this. They’ve sold their souls to the automobile manufacturers.

      We’ve been on roads in LA with seven lanes in each direction, with other roads running in parallel. Hideous.

    • But Houston & San Antonio are fundamentally is better than most… a wagon wheel: concentric rings and spokes for controlled access overlaid onto a grid for low speed roads.
      Sprawl is another culprit, forces folks to use already clogged streets.

    • ​​​@@jasonbrecht8572Only if you don’t have local goods and services, not to mention a safe, reliable and convenient public transport and streets.
      Stop building “strodes”, giving favors to big box stores and all Big Corp.
      Build mixed use neighborhoods with mid to low speed streets with small diverse commercial use (maybe mixed use building like old towns) around residential cells with low and mid density mixed, with PROHIBITED HOA, dedicated bike lanes (not for everyone, specially the elderly or service people) without being close to heavy and fast traffic, trams connecting neighborhoods, wide pleasant sidewalks on streets and stores, limited parking spaces (at most 1/3 of current planning), schools, clinics, even hospitals, etc.
      Enforce neighborhood policing, public transport and proximity policing, neighborhood watch, surveilance cameras, NO GUN FREE ZONES!

    • @@davidmorgan6896I believe the Katy freeway in Houston is still one of the biggest in the US. It was for sure the biggest a few years ago, but some other city might have been dumb enough to top it.

  4. Actually, this paradox can be exploited by artificially obstructing central parts of the city and inventivising the traffic to redistribute with a wider spread in the city. So it’s possible to make it better by making it worse.

  5. As someone who use to live on a two lane road before they widened it…. widening increases traffic and accidents and now a 5 minute distance is now a 15 minute distance. And its a lot uglier since they took out all the woods around here to make that happen.

  6. I cant express just how accurate this series is, this is exactly how many projects are run (by a load of coffee drinking morons) in government and academic organisations here in Australia.

Channels Television – LIVE

Sports Events 2023 | Sport Current Affairs 2023 in English | Agami Khel prtiyogita Current Affairs