in

Mass Protests in India Against Dismantling Sharia Courts – Morris

Chaperones for entertainers
Democracy institutionalises us
Elections are now Push Gossip – We are spoon fed
The damage that Dams do
……………………..
Links to Indian Protests

……………………..
Donations (always an email reply) to:
Paypal or Skrill to: morris108vn@gmail.com

or:

Bitcoin: 14oA2h4TpLHr6ejQzH6NjEh4KPM6ReGd3z

What do you think?

Written by daily reporters

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

GIPHY App Key not set. Please check settings

33 Comments

    • In India the shariah laws are limited and Muslims do not have permission to follow full Islamic laws in public. The criminal laws are common to all, only in the case of Inheritance, Marriage, Polygamy, Adoption etc Muslims were given the right to practice under the Indian constitution way back in 1956 (I assume). Even if Muslims have full shariah, it can’t impose the laws on non-Muslims, as long as non-Muslims pay some kind of tax (jazhia) to the Islamic Government and they will get full protection to practice their religion. Having said this, the non-Muslims have to submit to the laws of the land in other cases outside their religion like punishments for adultery, sodomy etc. There are many christians, jews in the middle than what people assume. They are there for ages now and enjoying their living among Muslims.

  1. I dont see how can this shari laws which ONLY applies to muslims in india affect the rest of the country.. India has second largest muslim communite after Indonesia if I am not mistaken

    • +krishna G Can you quote for me where it says in Quran to stone women for not accepting to marrying who her parents approved…thank you…I am waiting….if other ppl want their own sharia they can seek it…if muslims want their sharia it is up to them and its their right…you dont understand what it is to not apply sharia for muslims…muslims do not think of this world…they fear what to answer their creator after death, thats why they fight for this sharia, they want to obey their creator. What is wrong with wanting to obey his or her creator?

    • +krishna G I am still waiting to quote the verse from holy quran about stoning to death a girl who refuses to marry a man they approve of…as to God, as far as I know there is only One God, the creator of the heavens and the earth.

    • +krishna G still waiting…you said a girl will be stoned if she is marrying a man her parents disapproves..so you have not provided proof from the quran you are busy insulting. I am done with you.

    • First I am not asking you for _advice_, do you have comprehension problems ?
      Second, I already responded to the post with the link, if you missed it check your glasses, Pasting it again right here:
      brahim119 20 hours ago (edited)+Jay Alan
      You have to do better than that, pasting a link from conservative self centered site with fixed ideas is laughable and have no historical value. Besides that could be an isolated case that could be misreported as most conservative and xenophobic sites, or could be true, however your response to Saintfromthemediev was  “There are exceptions though.” So you think of exceptions only when it fits your desired thinking, nice try Jay, nice try. Waiting for serious historical facts of what you persist on advancing.  But I think you will end up disappearing or changing your account name.
      Why do I have a feeling that you are still incapable of providing what is asked from you, you have tried to deviate but unsuccessfully, now will you provide what I asked, or should I give up on you ?

    • +Jay Alan
      Where did I or anyone here ask you to read anything ? No doubt you do have a comprehension problem, I assume English is your native language, in this case your problem is even more serious. Now you think you will escape that easily, poor comprehension or not.
      Let me resume to make it easier for you.
      In your first post you wrote with such great confidence: _Don’t be childish. Syariah law in majority muslims applies to all including non-muslims._
      According to your confidence of your statement, I am only asking you to provide evidence to back up your statement. I even suggested to check from the Christian and Jewish sources, since according to you the Shari’a applies to them like it does for the Muslims. Again you have English comprehension problem, *I did not ask you to read anything,* I asked you *to provide proofs of what you stated.* How hard is it to understand such a simple request ?  However, I see signs of weakness in your argument when you start saying that I _need medical attention,_ is that the best you could do ? Because that is definitely a sign of someone who is cornered, and I think I cornered you, I don’t find it amusing but you asked for it, now I am still waiting.

    • +brahim119 Well, one word. Have you read the links i have provided and comment on it? It is the very start of my arguments and you refuse to read and keep asking me for more evidences. Just pointless to continue when you refuse to read.

    • I responded to your link in my fifth comment and then pasted it again in my eighth comment since you pretended to have not seen it.

      Pasting here the fifth comment again which is *my response* to your link.

      brahim119 1 day ago (edited)
      +Jay Alan
      You have to do better than that, pasting a link from conservative self centered site with fixed ideas is laughable and have no historical value. Besides that could be an isolated case that could be misreported as most conservative and xenophobic sites, or could be true, however your response to Saintfromthemediev was “There are exceptions though.” So you think of exceptions only when it fits your desired thinking, nice try Jay, nice try. Waiting for serious historical facts of what you persist on advancing. But I think you will end up disappearing or changing your account name.

      If my response is not clear to you, tell me how clear you want it to be ?

      Now. you can deviate and play games until you run out of breath, you still have to provide proofs to what you stated with such great confidence *in you very first comment* which is _”Don’t be childish. Syariah law in majority muslims applies to all including non-muslims.”_
      So since you are so confident, then you should have aboslutely no problem providing proofs to back up your claims. Is that clear enough ? Or is it time for you to admit that you are incapable of providing anything to back up your *confident* claims ?

  2. The fascist Hindu nationalists, who have captured power in India, are vehemently anti-Muslim, and the move to abolish the sharia law is their latest tactic to harass the large (and mostly backward) Muslim community. Such fascist actions and the barbaric anti-Muslim riots have the support of the media, and also earn them rich political dividend in elections. Indian democracy is a total farce. It is a curse for the Muslims because here democracy only means oppression of the majority over minority.

    • the situation in India is different because the population is so massive that even 1% is more than many countries entire population so a around 17 % is huge population and if they want a certain system then in a secular government you are bound to give them as far as a Muslim majority country Bangladesh has both Hindu and Muslim law

  3. Modi is a dangerous fool for India. He thinks losing one beautiful part of India in 1947 was not enough, precisely because Muslims then were alienated by some fools like Modi, and Pakistan was ostensibly created in the name of Islam. Certainly the Anglo-Zionists happily contributed to the division of India after WWI. It makes one wonders if Modi is the number one enemy of the great India and that he’s there to destroy her. You can take everything from a Muslim but never, EVER her/his religion. So a word to the wise.

    • Even Saudi Arabia has banned Triple Talaq….Then what problem you have with it.?
      And Mughals also banned Beef…Why problem with it ?
      And Polygamy is Anti- human,…& it has to be abolished,…The India won’t get divided again at any cost. Hindu Nationalist like me can sacrifice millions of lives for it..but the nation will remain secular & united.

    • *@Universal* Slow down universal soldier, no one and especially not me wants to see India shed one more inch of blessed and beautiful territory, she’s great the ways she is. If you are truly patriotic as you claim to be, then keep an eye on angry and over emotional rulers, history is witness that angry leaders have brought only misery to their own nations. Keep the flag raised but look at the big picture, pay close attention to the grand chess board, Keep a keen eye on the BRICS and if (God forbid) it’s sabotaged, ask yourself _cui bono._ Evil forces from outside are working overtime and want to see your country and other countries broken down into smaller and weak insignificant states. The likes like Modi, the House of Saud, the Hollands and the Merkels are the perfect instruments. Don’t history ever teach you guys anything ?

  4. You can’t generalise about a dam’s impact towards flooding. Indeed, in China major dam projects like the Three Gorges were designed from the outset to prevent flooding. As you may know, several of the deadliest natural disasters in all of recorded history were floods that occurred in China. I invite you to look at the 1887 Yellow River flood and the 1931 China floods.

    At any rate it’s perhaps foolish to assume that damming the Mekong will increase the risk of flooding.

    • There is a consensus that dams are responsible for adverse effects on the environment. And I would equate denying that with the arguments put out by tobacco companies that cigarette smoking is not harmful.

City of Ghosts talks ISIS, Raqqa and heroic citizen journalists

US Waging Proxy War in Syria Ft Marwa Osman on Loud and Clear